--- description: Review of OmTrak Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: OmTrak | Reviews, Pricing & Demos - SoftwareAdvice AU --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Construction Management Software](/directory/19/project-management-software/software) > [OmTrak](/software/79089/webfm) # OmTrak Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/79089/webfm Page: 1 / 6\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/79089/webfm?page=2) > OmTrak gives Owners, Developers, Architects, Engineers and Contractors the power to collaborate. OmTrak has easy to use tools for everyone in the construction team. Allowing users to collaborate and manage construction information throughout all stages. Each project has unlimited users with access levels set by managers. Users can access OmTrak via the web or mobile App. Teams will reach a new level of efficiency, whilst producing quality building information. Experience reduced closeout delays and a smooth transition to facility management. > > Verdict: Rated **4.2/5** by 117 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.2/5** | 117 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 70% | (7/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: WebFM - **Location**: Irvine, US - **Founded**: 2000 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: $1,000.00 - **Pricing model**: Per User - **Pricing Details**: Priced per project. Contact WebFM for pricing details. - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Android (Mobile), iPhone (Mobile), iPad (Mobile) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, New Zealand, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, United States ## Features - Access Controls/Permissions - Approval Process Control - Asset Tracking - Audit Trail - Barcode/Ticket Scanning - Barcoding/RFID - Bid Management - Collaboration Tools - Commercial - Commercial Properties - Contract/License Management - Contractor Management - Cost Estimating - Document Management - Document Storage - Equipment Management - Equipment Tracking - Estimating - Facility Scheduling - Fixed Asset Management ## Integrations (1 total) - SAP Business One ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - Chat ## Category - [Construction Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/directory/19/project-management-software/software) ## Related Categories - [Construction Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/directory/19/project-management-software/software) - [Web-Based Construction Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/directory/42/web-based-project-management-software/software) - [Capital Program and Portfolio Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/directory/69/program-management-software/software) - [Construction Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/directory/1722/best-apps/software) - [Real Estate Development Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/directory/3749/real-estate-development/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Autodesk Forma](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/390033/autodesk-construction-cloud) — 4.3/5 (2204 reviews) 2. [Houzz Pro](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/101873/houzz-pro) — 4.3/5 (1085 reviews) 3. [Sage Construction Suite](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/185440/sage-construction-suite) — 4.0/5 (1014 reviews) 4. [Knowify](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/110463/knowify-general-contractor) — 4.5/5 (109 reviews) 5. [Leap](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/110460/leap) — 4.3/5 (385 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Omtrak for Construction Closeout" — 5.0/5 > **Deepu** | *9 October 2019* | Construction | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Easiness in use and user friendly. Unique Assets schedule that can be build under parent child relationship. Access to all concerned parties makes the documentation easy. Very fast servers for accessing and retrieving data. > > **Cons**: Personally all features and well kept benefiting one way or other. > > Very good. ----- ### "it is very clear instruction and easy to use" — 4.0/5 > **Wendy** | *7 August 2019* | Construction | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: I like the set up (easy to follow) and functional well, > > **Cons**: you can't change when you make mistake, and have to contract WebFM people to unlock before make changes. > > it is very good for documentation purpose. it makes job a lot easier and faster. ----- ### "NZ Review" — 3.0/5 > **Mike** | *7 August 2019* | Design | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Pros**: I don't consider Omtrak to have any advantages over the Aconex system that I have had more experience with > > **Cons**: Some terminology (e.g. the use of the term 'manuals' in project design stages) is inconsistent with common industry practice in NZ. The indexing/scheduling arrangement of correspondence is not very intuitive to me Lacks document format options and features I work on multiple projects, often with different management systems. It is challenging to effectively switch between them. I find Omtrak to be less intuitive than Aconex which I use more frequently. ----- ### "Construction Review" — 4.0/5 > **Aaron** | *5 June 2019* | Construction | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: The system works very quickly when uploading documents etc. The job set ups are simple and very easy to use. > > **Cons**: Some items / descriptions in drop down boxes are not relevant to the project you are working on. > > Omtrak has been excellent for uploading of Construction manuals for one of our main clients and the site works option for defects is very handy and easy to use. ----- ### "Omtrak for Defence Projects" — 4.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *7 August 2019* | Construction | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Pros**: The user interface is very intuitive and does not take allot of training. Phone and email support is normally very responsive, although your level of support at project level can vary depending on who is assigned against your project. > > **Cons**: 1. Every time you login, you have to press "I'm not a robot", every single time, this gets very annoying and when you look at other platforms that still meet compliance requirements, this is only done on rare occasion. 2. Reporting ability does not allow for flexibility. You'll find yourself using "Content \& Status Summary" and creating your own dashboards in Excel. 3. No ability to create dashboards with multiple reporting graphs. 4. You can only apply one filter at a time against a report. 5. In work list, display does not show the location the works were signed against (which it does for example in maintenance schedules view), this created allot of heartache for us when using this for maintenance. 6. When you export to PDF, there is no opportunity to customize the title of the exported PDF. 7. There is limited ability to copy and paste asset attributes to save time. 8. Can not "copy and paste" folders from one project to another. Can not "Copy and Paste" more than one section within an folder at one time. This is a big draw back if you have projects and buildings that are identical. 9. When you export a section, any attachments are not downloaded within the PDF, they require web access to Omtrak. This is a drawback if you want to send a stakeholder a section. The only times the documents are included is when Omtrak burn the hard disks at the very end. 10. Understanding the error reports within Omtrak can be confusing. 11. You are limited to only a 3 step review > > This platform was mandated in our client contract. It would help those that are not very familiar with the Defence completion process. I would suggest when engaging Omtrak, get them to be responsible for adding in all the assets and asset information required for Defence. That process along took allot of work and Omtrak originally offered that as a service to us, although it wasn't stipulated in the contract agreement. Our project contact from Omtrak changed a number of times over the 2 year project period and the level of support varied from individual to individual. ----- Page: 1 / 6\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/79089/webfm?page=2) ## Links - [View on SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/79089/webfm) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | ----- ## Structured Data