--- description: Review of easeRequirements for Jira Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: easeRequirements for Jira | Reviews, Pricing & Demos - SoftwareAdvice AU --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Requirements Management Software](/directory/4640/requirements-management/software) > [easeRequirements for Jira](/software/266827/r4j) # easeRequirements for Jira Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/266827/r4j Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/266827/r4j?page=2) > Teams using Jira often struggle to manage requirements in a structured and controlled way. easeRequirements helps product managers, business analysts, and engineering teams define, organize, and trace requirements directly within Jira without adding a separate system. By introducing structured hierarchies, full traceability, and version control, teams can clearly understand how requirements connect to development work. Changes are tracked, impacts are visible, and gaps can be identified early, reducing rework and improving delivery confidence. easeRequirements supports teams working in complex or regulated environments by enabling baselines, coverage analysis, and reusable requirement structures. It is a strong fit for organizations that need audit readiness, clear ownership, and consistent requirement management across projects while staying fully within the Jira ecosystem. > > Verdict: Rated **4.7/5** by 6 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.7/5** | 6 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 5.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 100% | (10/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: ease solutions - **Location**: Oberhausen, Germany - **Founded**: 2003 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: USD 10.00 - **Pricing model**: Per User (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: Pricing is based on your Jira user tier and deployment type, whether Cloud or Data Center. It starts at approximately $1 per user per month and scales with team size through Atlassian’s tiered pricing model. Billing is handled directly through the Atlassian Marketplace with monthly or annual options. A 30-day free trial is available for all team sizes, and enterprise pricing is offered for large-scale deployments. - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Algeria, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Bhutan, Bolivia, Brazil, Brunei, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Croatia and 87 more ## Features - API - Access Controls/Permissions - Administrator Level Control - Alerts/Notifications - Baseline Manager - Change Management - Compliance Management - Configurable Workflow - Customizable Fields - Customizable Reports - Customizable Templates - Data Import/Export - Data Synchronization - Document Management - Document Storage - Drag & Drop - Lifecycle Management - Release Management - Reporting & Statistics - Reporting/Analytics ## Integrations (6 total) - Bitbucket - Confluence - JIRA Service Management - Jira - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Word ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base ## Category - [Requirements Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/directory/4640/requirements-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Requirements Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/directory/4640/requirements-management/software) - [ALM Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/directory/3325/alm-tools/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Advanced Installer](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/199648/advanced-installer) — 4.6/5 (135 reviews) 2. [AWS Elastic Beanstalk](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/390218/aws-elastic-beanstalk) — 4.8/5 (16 reviews) 3. [Wrike](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/3777/wrike-pm) — 4.4/5 (2987 reviews) 4. [Polarion ALM](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/152329/polarion-alm) — 4.4/5 (19 reviews) 5. [Dynatrace](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/234304/dynatrace) — 4.6/5 (83 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Simple Requirement Management for JIRA" — 5.0/5 > **Rahul** | *13 July 2022* | Industrial Automation | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The simplistic interface of R4J Add-In makes it very easy to manage and track requirements within the JIRA. Most software projects manage requirements using JIRA, but most struggle with managing requirements and organizing them, R4J excels in this aspect. > > **Cons**: The provision to define multiple versions of requirements could be a good value add. As of now, we have to update the single requirement if the requirement updates. It makes it little difficult to track the old requirements. Yes, we can do that via the History tab but this would be a good option to add. > > It is a good add-in that mixes very well with your JIRA experience and is very consistent with JIRA in all the ways. I would recommend anyone looking to manage requirements well in JIRA to consider this add-in. ----- ### "R4J for more than requirements" — 4.0/5 > **Henrik** | *16 November 2020* | Automotive | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Easy to keep everyone involved in the requirement management. Makes traceability easy and simple for everyone to understand. The issue tree view, easy to organize and get an overview. Helps all work in JIRA. Easy to create export templates, both word and excel. > > **Cons**: Export template error messages could be improved. > > Helps throughout our ASPICE process development. Keeps traceability from customer requirements - test cases - test executions - documentation. ----- ### "Now we have our Jira data structured\!" — 5.0/5 > **Thomas** | *27 October 2021* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: We were looking for a tool to organize our customer requirements and development tasks in a structured hierarchy. With R4J we found an easy and cost-efficient solution. The revision history and the baselining capability help us to keep track of our change history. The multi-level coverage provides us an overview of all depending elements. Quick way to share my views with my project team. > > **Cons**: Minor small features missing, but this doesn´t matter. ----- ### "R4J for medical devices" — 4.0/5 > **Petra** | *5 November 2021* | Medical Devices | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: I love the easy child access here, along with R4Js capability to handle any amount of parent-child hierarchies you might desire to trace (and document coverage of) your requirement. Take T4J in addition and this capability extends to verification specifications and even verification reports. 👍 I also appreciate the flexible export options to word documents with an extensible configuration language and word templates. > > **Cons**: That R4J and T4J are not available as cloud products (yet?) > > CogniMed provides technical development services in regulated industries such as medical technology and aviation. We develop hardware, software and complete products for customers. Our focus is on perfectly documented development services for this demanding environment. We have been using R4J for many years and projects by now. It is is perfect for our needs. Our customers love it, too and some have acquired the tools themselves after learning how to work with it at our company.“ ----- ### "Using R4J for Jira Requirements Management" — 5.0/5 > **Joyce** | *23 August 2022* | Government Administration | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Cost, setup, and ease of use. Traceability and Requirements reuse were a must for us. > > **Cons**: Would like more granular permissions in folder view. > > This is an awesome app. We have successfully built a full Application Lifecycle Management tool within Jira. R4J offers requirement reuse, baselines, and complete traceability. This tool comes along with exceptional customer support as well. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/266827/r4j?page=2) ## Links - [View on SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/266827/r4j) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | ----- ## Structured Data