--- description: Review of JBoss EAP Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: JBoss EAP | Reviews, Pricing & Demos - SoftwareAdvice AU --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Portal Software](/directory/4405/portal/software) > [JBoss EAP](/software/292059/red-hat-jboss-portal) # JBoss EAP Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/292059/red-hat-jboss-portal Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/292059/red-hat-jboss-portal?page=2) > JBoss EAP is a portal management software designed to help businesses deploy applications with enterprise-grade security across environments. The platform enables managers to gain insights into subsystems and manage servers in an offline mode. Additionally, JBoss EAP allows teams to utilize the management console user interface to navigate across large-scale domain configurations. JBoss EAP lets businesses integrate the system with several third-party applications including FusionReactor, MyEclipse and TimeShiftX. Pricing is available on request and support is extended via phone, forum, FAQs, knowledge base and email. > > Verdict: Rated **4.7/5** by 18 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.7/5** | 18 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Red Hat ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: Per Feature - **Pricing Details**: Contact Red Hat for pricing details. - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: United States ## Features - API - Activity Dashboard - Content Management - Search/Filter - Third-Party Integrations - Version Control ## Integrations (4 total) - FusionReactor - MyEclipse - RTVIEW 360-degree APM PLATFORM - TimeShiftX ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support ## Category - [Portal Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/directory/4405/portal/software) ## Alternatives 1. [HulerHub](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/323266/huler-hub) — 4.9/5 (89 reviews) 2. [kitchen.co](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/427630/kitchen-co) — 4.9/5 (117 reviews) 3. [SuiteDash](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/119278/suitedash) — 4.8/5 (612 reviews) 4. [BoardPro](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/50425/boardpro) — 4.8/5 (822 reviews) 5. [Clinked](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/129910/clinked) — 4.9/5 (110 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Jboss in comparison with Oracle's Weblogic" — 4.0/5 > **Saad** | *3 June 2021* | Financial Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: We as a financial institution have Temenos T24 Core Banking System implemented that runs over Oracle's WebLogic Manage servers, as far as the production environment is concerned. However, recently we shifted all our testing environments to Jboss, cutting down massive licensing cost of WebLogic. JBoss is a dream if its pricing is compared with other competitor application servers in the international market. It is very light weight and does not consumer much resources in comparison. > > **Cons**: The only baggage it comes with is the lack of support if required during implementation, apart from whatever material is available on the world wide web. However, the immense learning behind its in-house implementation is also a blessing in disguise. > > I think for any organization, two things matter the most. 1) Resource consumption for the test/uat environments running in datacenter. 2) Licensing cost for maintenance and extensibility of the product. 3) Convenient deployment mechanism for administrator. JBoss provides a great experience in above mentioned areas. ----- ### "JbossEAP\_02-07-2022" — 5.0/5 > **Osman** | *2 July 2022* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: It is very useful to deploy jakarta enterprise based services and applications. > > **Cons**: Application servers area is out of date versus containerization tech. > > I develop java app and deploy on it. ----- ### "Jboss easy to use" — 5.0/5 > **Awais** | *3 June 2021* | Banking | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Pros**: The best thing about Jboss is easy to use compare to other app servers > > **Cons**: configuration of additional WAR files is abit complex compare to weblogic > > so far so good ----- ### "Red Hat Jboss for the Core Banking Industry with respect to Performance/cost and Ease of Use." — 5.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *4 June 2021* | Banking | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: 1. Its very very Cheap, In-fact its free ware where as we were using previously Weblogic and that is much more expensive and complex as well. 2. We also used Websphare and that is also complex as well as costly. 3. Its performance is too good. 4. Its not a hardware hungry software and its very light and less Resources. 5. I have executed COB on Jboss, Weblogic and Websphare. The Result of Jboss was too much excellent. with Same hardware Websphare took 5.5 Hours Weblogic took 6 hours and Jboss took only 4 hours. > > **Cons**: Nothing is least. Its excellent and i have used this software both features i.e. as Standalone as well as Cluster based with Active MQ. Further if you need any help just google it and you will get its fix. > > I am using Jboss from last 5 years and i have very very good experience of Jboss. Being administrator i am using this for the Core Banking software where there are 5000 Users to use it. We have replaced Weblogic with Jboss. Just to decrease cost and boost performance. As i told you its very light not a resource hungry software. ----- ### "Reliable, light and low maintenance online Portal" — 5.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *8 July 2020* | Government Administration | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: Our organization used Redhat Jboss 7 to host our Intranet. It was a quick and easy way for us to manage our internal news and content over a customizable portal. Publishing and managing content was easily managed and was delegated to various content publishers across the organizations. > > **Cons**: It did not support any of the new HTML5 standards. It was a good product to disseminate static content across out organization for informational purposes. > > Overall, it was a good stable portal which required very low maintenance and upkeep. It ran its course when more robust content management Dashboard such as Confluence, Simpplr, etc became available. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/292059/red-hat-jboss-portal?page=2) ## Links - [View on SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/292059/red-hat-jboss-portal) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | ----- ## Structured Data