OpenClinica is a clinical data management and electronic data capture solution designed to help medical institutions...
IBM Clinical Development
4.3
Overall rating
Reviews
Software Advice offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.
Learn more
About IBM Clinical Development
IBM Clinical Development is a clinical trial solution that helps with clinical data management. The main features of IBM Clinical Development include randomization, Watson AI-powered medical coding, patient engagement, Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment (eCOA), reporting and analytics, electronic data capture, eConsent, and trial supply management.
IBM Clinical Development pricing
IBM Clinical Development does not have a free version but does offer a free trial. IBM Clinical Development paid version starts at USD 1.00/month.
Starting Price:
USD 1.00/month
Free Version:
No
Free trial:
Yes
Alternatives to IBM Clinical Development
The Clinical Trial Management System (CTMS) offered by Medidata Solutions is a platform designed to enhance the...
SmarteXp is a cloud-based patient engagement solution, designed to help small to large hospitals and clinics communicate...
OpsVeda is a platform that provides operations intelligence to enable businesses to make smarter operations decisions...
ZEBOC
0
ZEBOC is a free, simple, and HIPAA compliant telemedicine solution that provides remote care capabilities to healthcare...
ResearchManager offers a sophisticated, flexible, and cost-effective eClinical platform encompassing Clinical Data...
IBM Clinical Development Reviews
Feature rating
4 reviews of 4
Rosemary
-
Review Source
Value for Money
5
Features
4
Ease of Use
5
Customer Support
5
5
Reviewed on 18/01/2017
IBM Clinical Development
This EDC is very user-friendly and allows for easy view of which pages are pending/reviewed/monitored. Logline options for Adverse Events, Concomitant Medications and Drug dosing allow for simple corrections and quick review of any changes required.
Susan
- Industry: Pharmaceuticals
- Company size: Self Employed
- Used Daily for 2+ years
-
Review Source
Value for Money
3
Features
5
Ease of Use
5
Customer Support
2
4
Reviewed on 10/02/2017
IBM Clinical Development Software Performs
I have used IBM Clinical Development for 6+years. It has very good functionality, offers lots of flexibility and is easy for the sites and CRAs. The system offers a modular approach, so you can select (and pay for) only the modules you want. On the downside, some of the modules are must haves and you have to pay for them when other systems include them in the base fee. The system really requires a programmer to set-up the studies and to be able to utilize all the functionality, and the customer support can be extremely slow. The reporting functionality is poor unless you purchase the reporting module, which is expensive. However, the programmers can program reports using the exports, so there is a way around reporting, these reports would just not be in the system for the users. The fees associated with the use of the software are high.
Pros
features, functionality, ease of use by end users
Cons
reporting features, necessity of needing a programmer to set-up, costs, user support
Verified Reviewer
- Industry: Hospital & Health Care
- Company size: 10,000+ Employees
- Used Weekly for 2+ years
-
Review Source
Value for Money
5
Features
4
Ease of Use
5
Customer Support
4
4
Reviewed on 05/05/2021
Effective EDC solution for Phase 1 and 4 clinical trials
Pros
Great Electronic Data Capture features
Cost effective
Many standard reports available
Cons
Not effective on large clinical studies using IBM CD
Clyde
- Industry: Biotechnology
- Company size: 1,001–5,000 Employees
- Used Daily for 2+ years
-
Review Source
Value for Money
0
Features
5
Ease of Use
2
Customer Support
0
4
Reviewed on 18/05/2021
Source of truth
I used it to submit my assay results, review analysts results and double-check data reports
Pros
It works although it's old and clunky and feels like windows 95 level technology. Using IBM Clinical Development allowed us to track assay performance, analytical reports and pretty much anything that was data related in the lab
Cons
It's old and because it is so deeply rooted in your lab environment you dont really have the choice to explore competitors without losing a lot of money on sunk cost.
Also, any time something needed to be validated, our life would get really hard
