--- description: Review of Laser AI Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: Laser AI | Reviews, Pricing & Demos - SoftwareAdvice AU --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Data Extraction Software](/directory/4555/data-extraction/software) > [Laser AI](/software/528160/Laser-AI) # Laser AI Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/528160/Laser-AI Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/528160/Laser-AI?page=2) > Laser AI is a software designed to accelerate the process of conducting systematic literature reviews. It provides innovative methods and cutting-edge technology to support researchers and healthcare professionals in their evidence-based decision-making. The software caters to a range of industries, including healthcare, academia, and research organizations, where comprehensive and up-to-date literature reviews are essential. Laser AI's AI-powered research and quality assessment tools streamline the screening and data extraction processes, saving researchers time and resources. Laser AI allows users to organize and reuse project templates and data extraction forms, ensuring consistency and collaboration across teams. The platform also supports living systematic reviews, enabling researchers to continuously update their work as new evidence emerges. Additionally, Laser AI's AI-assisted data extraction and quality assurance features ensure the final review is audit-ready and transparent, with a detailed project history. > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 9 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.8/5** | 9 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Evidence Prime - **Location**: Hamilton, Canada ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: USD 3,000.00 - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: Please contact Evidence Prime for pricing details. - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500 - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Chromebook (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Belgium, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana and 174 more ## Features - AI/Machine Learning - API - Access Controls/Permissions - Auto Extraction - Batch Processing - Collaboration Tools - Customizable Fields - Customizable Templates - Data Aggregation and Publishing - Data Connectors - Data Import/Export - Data Mapping - Data Storage Management - Data Verification - Document Extraction - Document Management - File Sharing - Image Extraction - Issue Management - Metadata Management ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support ## Category - [Data Extraction Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/directory/4555/data-extraction/software) ## Related Categories - [Data Extraction Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/directory/4555/data-extraction/software) - [Project Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/directory/4430/project-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Parsio](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/337655/parsio) — 4.7/5 (234 reviews) 2. [Scrapfly](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/253895/scrapfly) — 4.9/5 (225 reviews) 3. [Apify](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/198361/apify) — 4.8/5 (416 reviews) 4. [NetNut](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/517009/NetNut) — 5.0/5 (88 reviews) 5. [ZenRows](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/326284/zenrows) — 4.8/5 (103 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Laser AI has great value for money and is a very useful tool for systematic review" — 5.0/5 > **Yuan** | *17 December 2025* | Health, Wellness & Fitness | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: I really like the project collaboration facilitated by Laser AI. The platform lets project managers assign roles, define access permissions, and track progress across different stages of the review. This structured organization helps my team coordinate complex reviews, monitor contributions, and avoid miscommunication. I also have received timely customer support, which has been wonderful experience. > > **Cons**: One limitation is that Laser AI is not very mobile-friendly. While it works well on a desktop or laptop, it’s difficult to perform meaningful screening or review tasks on a phone or tablet, which limits flexibility when working on the go. Another is that some actions and decisions are not easy to reverse. For example, switching a task or project from a single-reviewer setup to a duplicate review workflow is not straightforward once work has started. ----- ### "Review of the LaserAI Software for Article Screening in Systematic Reviews" — 5.0/5 > **Silvio** | *5 August 2025* | Human Resources | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: LaserAI offers a highly intuitive and user-friendly interface, which significantly facilitates the learning curve and enhances productivity. The collaborative features are particularly helpful when multiple reviewers are involved in the screening process. A notable advantage is the AI-driven keyword highlighting, which streamlines the identification of relevant articles and supports more efficient decision-making. > > **Cons**: Some limitations and suggestions could be implemented. First, it would be beneficial to include a dedicated tab for duplicates, allowing users to organize and manage them more effectively. Currently, I had to manually record duplicate entries using the comment section. Additionally, enabling users to edit abstracts directly within the software would be highly valuable—especially in cases where abstracts are missing or incomplete in the exported files, requiring manual insertion from the original sources. Finally, I experienced occasional software slowdowns or freezing; however, it is unclear whether these issues were related to the platform itself or to local internet connectivity. > > LaserAI demonstrates considerable potential as a supportive tool for systematic reviews. While there are areas for enhancement, the software already offers a solid and efficient framework for article screening. I am confident that with continued development, it will become an even more robust and indispensable resource for researchers. ----- ### "COBE Review" — 4.0/5 > **Daniela** | *19 August 2025* | Writing & Editing | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: It is practical to choose studies with the terms highlighted and with the possible terms that we can exclude. > > **Cons**: Laser AI put it as a "conflict" even though there were only different justifications in included studies. ----- ### "Proportion of agenesis of permanent teeth: a systematic review protocol" — 5.0/5 > **Natália** | *4 August 2025* | E-Learning | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: I greatly appreciated the interface. It is practical, straightforward, and easy to use. The artificial intelligence provides significant support in the data extraction process. > > **Cons**: In the study selection process, even when the reviewers have made the same decision to reject an article, if they provided different justifications, Laser AI flags it as a discrepancy to be resolved. This results in some unnecessary time expenditure. > > The Laser AI tool has been highly beneficial in the development of my systematic review. Its interface is simple, straightforward, and easy to use, and the processes of study selection and data removal, supported by artificial intelligence, greatly optimize the workflow. ----- ### "Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Pain Relief During Orthodontic Treatment: a Systematic Review" — 5.0/5 > **Cintia** | *18 August 2025* | Research | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Laser AI is an excellent platform for systematic reviews in health research. The interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making the screening and data extraction processes much more efficient. I also value the collaborative features, which allow multiple reviewers to work on the same project with transparency. > > **Cons**: The main issue I experienced is with the reference loading process. The platform currently loads items in batches of 50, and every time I request the next 50, it scrolls back to the first study on the list, which is unproductive. Another limitation is in task distribution: it would be very helpful to have the option to assign 100% of the references to two reviewers for independent screening. > > Overall, my experience with Laser AI has been very positive. The platform has streamlined key steps in the systematic review process and has made collaborative work easier and faster. Despite some technical improvements that would enhance usability, I find Laser AI to be a valuable, reliable, and efficient tool that I will continue to use and recommend to colleagues. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/528160/Laser-AI?page=2) ## Links - [View on SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.com.au/software/528160/Laser-AI) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | ----- ## Structured Data